All articles
    Governance Guidance

    MAT Governance Structures Explained: Boards, Committees, and Local Governing Bodies

    OneGovs Team
    18 September 2025
    9 min read

    Multi-academy trust governance is more complex than single school governance — and that complexity only increases as trusts grow. Understanding the structure clearly is essential for everyone involved, from newly appointed governors to experienced Directors of Governance.

    Members, Trustees, and the Trust Board

    At the top of every academy trust sits the members — the legal owners of the trust. Members are analogous to shareholders in a company limited by guarantee. They appoint (and can remove) trustees, approve changes to the trust's articles of association, and receive the annual accounts. Most trusts have between three and five members.

    The trust board (or board of trustees) is responsible for the strategic direction, financial oversight, and accountability of the entire trust. Trustees are charity trustees and company directors — a dual legal responsibility that carries significant obligations. The trust board sets the vision, approves the budget, holds the CEO and executive team to account, and ensures compliance with the trust's funding agreement.

    Committees: Statutory and Non-Statutory

    Most trust boards delegate specific areas of oversight to committees. While the exact structure varies between trusts, common committees include:

    • Finance and Audit Committee: Oversight of financial management, internal scrutiny, and the annual audit.
    • Standards/Education Committee: Monitoring educational performance, curriculum strategy, and pupil outcomes.
    • Risk and Compliance Committee: Oversight of risk management, safeguarding, and regulatory compliance.
    • Pay and Personnel Committee: Executive remuneration and HR policy oversight.

    Committees don't replace the trust board — they prepare the ground. Recommendations flow back to the full board for ratification on significant decisions.

    Local Governing Bodies and the Scheme of Delegation

    Local governing bodies (LGBs) provide school-level governance within a MAT structure. Their powers and responsibilities are defined by the trust's scheme of delegation — arguably the most important governance document in any multi-academy trust.

    The scheme of delegation sets out which decisions are reserved to the trust board, which are delegated to committees, which sit with LGBs, and which are the responsibility of the headteacher or principal. A well-drafted scheme of delegation is specific, practical, and regularly reviewed.

    Members
    Trust Board (Trustees)
    Committees (Finance, Standards, Risk, etc.)
    Local Governing Bodies (LGBs)

    How Governance Structure Changes as MATs Grow

    A three-school MAT can operate with relatively simple governance arrangements. A 20-school MAT cannot. As trusts grow, governance structures typically evolve in several ways:

    • Committee structures become more formalised with clearer terms of reference and more frequent meetings.
    • Regional or cluster boards may be introduced as an intermediate governance layer between the trust board and individual LGBs.
    • The scheme of delegation becomes more detailed, with clearer thresholds for decision-making authority.
    • The governance professional role expands from a single clerk to a governance team, often led by a Director of Governance.

    Managing governance across your MAT? See how OneGovs maps your entire governance structure — from trust board to local governing bodies — in a single, centralised platform.

    Book a Free Demo

    Common Structural Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

    Mistake 1: LGBs with undefined powers. If the scheme of delegation doesn't clearly specify what LGBs can and can't decide, confusion and overstepping are inevitable. Review and update the scheme annually.

    Mistake 2: Too many committees with overlapping remits. Committee proliferation creates scheduling problems and dilutes focus. Consolidate where possible and ensure terms of reference don't duplicate responsibilities.

    Mistake 3: Members who don't understand their role. Members are sometimes appointed without a clear briefing on their specific, limited responsibilities. This leads to either disengagement or inappropriate interference in operational matters.

    Mistake 4: Governance structure that doesn't match operational reality. If the trust has regionalised its operations but still runs governance centrally, there's a structural disconnect that will eventually cause problems.

    Share
    OneGovs

    OneGovs Team

    OneGovs is a governance management platform purpose-built for UK multi-academy trusts, local authorities, and governing bodies. We write about governance best practice, compliance, and sector developments.